[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpVpDqhO8B8_iKL5@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:23:10 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Remove unneeded lockdep_assert_cpus_held()
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:29:31AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> @@ -6906,7 +6898,6 @@ static int wq_affn_dfl_set(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> if (affn == WQ_AFFN_DFL)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - cpus_read_lock();
> mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
>
> wq_affn_dfl = affn;
> @@ -6917,7 +6908,6 @@ static int wq_affn_dfl_set(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
> - cpus_read_unlock();
This part isn't explained in the patch description. Can you separate it out
to a separate patch or add description in this patch?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists