linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Firefly CORE PX30 JD4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2101274.K71DO8KEF6@diego>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 22:07:56 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>,
 Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Firefly CORE PX30 JD4

Am Dienstag, 16. Juli 2024, 19:45:44 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
> Hello Christopher,
> 
> On 2024-07-16 17:51, Christopher Obbard wrote:
> > The Firefly CORE PX30 JD4 board is a SOM and motherboard bundle from
> > Firefly containing the Rockchip PX30 SOC. This series adds support for 
> > it.
> > 
> > ---
> > Christopher Obbard (2):
> >       dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add Firefly CORE PX30 JD4
> >       arm64: dts: rockchip: add Firefly CORE PX30 JD4
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml          |   5 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile              |   1 +
> >  .../dts/rockchip/px30-firefly-core-px30-jd4.dts    | 562 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 568 insertions(+)
> 
> It would be better to split this into two separate files: a dtsi
> for the SoM, and a dts for the carrier board (which would include
> the new dtsi).  That would reflect the actual hardware better.

correct :-) .

There are numerous examples of these types in the kernel
already, both these combinations - for inspiration :-) .