linux-kernel - RE: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB612916646EC106E6AEA22149B9A22@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 05:40:20 +0000
From: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@...el.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
CC: "jiangshan.ljs@...group.com" <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Nikula, Jani"
	<jani.nikula@...el.com>, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@...el.com>, "Kurmi,
 Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@...el.com>,
	"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 2:23 PM
> To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@...el.com>
> Cc: jiangshan.ljs@...group.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Nikula, Jani
> <jani.nikula@...el.com>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@...el.com>; Kurmi,
> Suresh Kumar <suresh.kumar.kurmi@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709)
> 
> Hello
> 
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:42 PM Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
> > commit 1726a17135905e2d2773f18d47bd4e17dd26e1ed
> > Author: Lai Jiangshan mailto:jiangshan.ljs@...group.com
> > Date:   Thu Jul 4 11:49:13 2024 +0800
> >
> >     workqueue: Put PWQ allocation and WQ enlistment in the same lock C.S.
> > `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> >
> > We could not revert the patch because of merge conflict but resetting to the
> parent of the commit seems to fix the issue
> >
> > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a
> fix if necessary?
> 
> 
> It has been fixed and it is in wq/for-6.11.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZpASNBN0hpTVcjE-@slm.duckdns.org/
> 

Thank you Lai for your response.

Regards

Chaitanya

> Thanks
> Lai