[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d095d235-e769-4472-9fad-339830277301@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:35:35 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-cgroup v7] cgroup: Show # of subsystem CSSes in
cgroup.stat
On 7/15/24 8:30 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> Cgroup subsystem state (CSS) is an abstraction in the cgroup layer to
> help manage different structures in various cgroup subsystems by being
> an embedded element inside a larger structure like cpuset or mem_cgroup.
>
> The /proc/cgroups file shows the number of cgroups for each of the
> subsystems. With cgroup v1, the number of CSSes is the same as the
> number of cgroups. That is not the case anymore with cgroup v2. The
> /proc/cgroups file cannot show the actual number of CSSes for the
> subsystems that are bound to cgroup v2.
>
> So if a v2 cgroup subsystem is leaking cgroups (usually memory cgroup),
> we can't tell by looking at /proc/cgroups which cgroup subsystems may
> be responsible.
>
> As cgroup v2 had deprecated the use of /proc/cgroups, the hierarchical
> cgroup.stat file is now being extended to show the number of live and
> dying CSSes associated with all the non-inhibited cgroup subsystems that
> have been bound to cgroup v2. The number includes CSSes in the current
> cgroup as well as in all the descendants underneath it. This will help
> us pinpoint which subsystems are responsible for the increasing number
> of dying (nr_dying_descendants) cgroups.
>
> The CSSes dying counts are stored in the cgroup structure itself
> instead of inside the CSS as suggested by Johannes. This will allow
> us to accurately track dying counts of cgroup subsystems that have
> recently been disabled in a cgroup. It is now possible that a zero
> subsystem number is coupled with a non-zero dying subsystem number.
>
> The cgroup-v2.rst file is updated to discuss this new behavior.
>
> With this patch applied, a sample output from root cgroup.stat file
> was shown below.
>
> nr_descendants 56
> nr_subsys_cpuset 1
> nr_subsys_cpu 43
> nr_subsys_io 43
> nr_subsys_memory 56
> nr_subsys_perf_event 57
> nr_subsys_hugetlb 1
> nr_subsys_pids 56
> nr_subsys_rdma 1
> nr_subsys_misc 1
> nr_dying_descendants 30
> nr_dying_subsys_cpuset 0
> nr_dying_subsys_cpu 0
> nr_dying_subsys_io 0
> nr_dying_subsys_memory 30
> nr_dying_subsys_perf_event 0
> nr_dying_subsys_hugetlb 0
> nr_dying_subsys_pids 0
> nr_dying_subsys_rdma 0
> nr_dying_subsys_misc 0
>
> Another sample output from system.slice/cgroup.stat was:
>
> nr_descendants 34
> nr_subsys_cpuset 0
> nr_subsys_cpu 32
> nr_subsys_io 32
> nr_subsys_memory 34
> nr_subsys_perf_event 35
> nr_subsys_hugetlb 0
> nr_subsys_pids 34
> nr_subsys_rdma 0
> nr_subsys_misc 0
> nr_dying_descendants 30
> nr_dying_subsys_cpuset 0
> nr_dying_subsys_cpu 0
> nr_dying_subsys_io 0
> nr_dying_subsys_memory 30
> nr_dying_subsys_perf_event 0
> nr_dying_subsys_hugetlb 0
> nr_dying_subsys_pids 0
> nr_dying_subsys_rdma 0
> nr_dying_subsys_misc 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
The patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists