[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dccttz5b44bl3lwmcaqz6wjx3n4sv3eq4yh6276vzwrtkcvqcw@qxhbo7bylnsg>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:20:50 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8650: add missing
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:05:22AM GMT, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add the missing CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT for the byte0_div_clk_src
> and byte1_div_clk_src, the clock rate should propagate to
> the corresponding _clk_src.
>
> Fixes: 9e939f008338 ("clk: qcom: add the SM8650 Display Clock Controller driver")
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8650.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
This doesn't seem correct, the byte1_div_clk_src is a divisor, so the
rate should not be propagated. Other platforms don't set this flag.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists