[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g8L-TA7kT92J_nX8PkjyGkqGeuXh4-ATOprhSPKsY7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:30:16 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@....de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: core: Call monitor_thermal_zone() if zone
temperature is invalid
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:15 PM Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@....de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2024-07-16, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > > On 2024-07-16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 1:48 AM Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@....de> wrote:
> > > > > On 2024-07-15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 2:54 PM Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@....de> wrote:
> > > > > > > On 2024-07-15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:09 AM Daniel Lezcano
> > > > > > > > <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 15/07/2024 06:45, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 01:46:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > Silencing the warnings is already a big improvement - and that patch
> > > > > > > works to this extent for me with an ax200, thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So attached is a patch that should avoid enabling the thermal zone
> > > > > > when it is not ready for use in the first place, so it should address
> > > > > > both the message and the useless polling.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would appreciate giving it a go (please note that it hasn't received
> > > > > > much testing so far, though).
> > > > >
> > > > > Sadly this patch doesn't seem to help:
> > > >
> > > > This is likely because it is missing checks for firmware image type.
> > > > I've added them to the attached new version. Please try it.
> > > >
> > > > I've also added two pr_info() messages to get a better idea of what's
> > > > going on, so please grep dmesg for "Thermal zone not ready" and
> > > > "Enabling thermal zone".
> > >
> > > This is the output with the patch applied:
> >
> > The ax200 wlan interface is currently not up/ configured (system
> > using its wired ethernet cards instead), the thermal_zone1 stops
> > if I manually enable the interface (ip link set dev wlp4s0 up)
> > after booting up:
>
> This explains it, thanks!
>
> The enabling of the thermal zone in iwl_mvm_load_ucode_wait_alive() is
> premature or it should get disabled in the other two places that clear
> the IWL_MVM_STATUS_FIRMWARE_RUNNING bit.
>
> I'm not sure why the thermal zone depends on whether or not this bit
> is set, though. Is it really a good idea to return errors from it if
> the interface is not up?
>
> > $ dmesg | grep -i -e iwlwifi -e thermal
> > [ 0.080899] CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM1)
> > [ 0.113768] thermal_sys: Registered thermal governor 'fair_share'
> > [ 0.113770] thermal_sys: Registered thermal governor 'bang_bang'
> > [ 0.113771] thermal_sys: Registered thermal governor 'step_wise'
> > [ 0.113772] thermal_sys: Registered thermal governor 'user_space'
> > [ 0.113773] thermal_sys: Registered thermal governor 'power_allocator'
> > [ 3.759673] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
> > [ 3.764918] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: Detected crf-id 0x3617, cnv-id 0x100530 wfpm id 0x80000000
> > [ 3.764974] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: PCI dev 2723/0084, rev=0x340, rfid=0x10a100
> > [ 3.769432] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 89.3.35.37
> > [ 3.873466] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: loaded firmware version 77.a20fb07d.0 cc-a0-77.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
> > [ 3.907122] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz, REV=0x340
> > [ 3.907886] iwl_mvm_thermal_zone_register: Thermal zone not ready
> > [ 4.032380] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: Detected RF HR B3, rfid=0x10a100
> > [ 4.032392] thermal thermal_zone1: Enabling thermal zone
> > [ 4.098308] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: base HW address: 94:e6:f7:XX:XX:XX
> > [ 4.112535] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 4.128306] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0 wlp4s0: renamed from wlan0
> > [ 4.369396] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 4.625385] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 4.881416] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 5.137377] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 5.394377] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 5.649412] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 5.905379] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 6.161380] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 6.418381] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 6.673381] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 6.929377] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [...]
> > [ 21.009413] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 21.265496] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 21.521462] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 21.777481] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 22.033468] thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)
> > [ 22.213120] thermal thermal_zone1: Enabling thermal zone
> > [ 22.283954] iwlwifi 0000:04:00.0: Registered PHC clock: iwlwifi-PTP, with index: 0
>
> Thanks for this data point!
>
> AFAICS the thermal zone in iwlwifi is always enabled, but only valid
> if the interface is up. It looks to me like the thermal core needs a
> special "don't poll me" error code to be returned in such cases.
Attached is a thermal core patch with an iwlwifi piece along the lines
above (tested lightly). It adds a way for a driver to indicate that
temperature cannot be provided at the moment, but that's OK and the
core need not worry about that.
Please give it a go.
View attachment "thermal-core-recheck-temperature.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3935 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists