[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xhsmha5ih1ofu.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:00:53 +0200
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti
<mtosatti@...hat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Use task_work_queued() on numa_work
On 25/06/24 15:52, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> @@ -3456,7 +3455,6 @@ void init_numa_balancing(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay;
> p->numa_migrate_retry = 0;
> /* Protect against double add, see task_tick_numa and task_numa_work */
> - p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
You'll want to get rid of the comment there as well.
> p->numa_faults = NULL;
> p->numa_pages_migrated = 0;
> p->total_numa_faults = 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists