[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjWc5dzcj2O1tEgNHY1rnQW63JwtuZi_vAZPqy6wqpoUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:17:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] power sequencing updates for v6.11-rc1
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 02:13, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> This PR contains the core power sequencing framework, the first driver, PCI
> changes using the pwrseq library (blessed by Bjorn Helgaas) and some fixes
> that came later.
Hmm. Let's see how this all works out, but I already found an annoyance.
It first asks me about the new PCI power sequencing driver.
And then it asks me separately if I want the power sequencing support.
Now, either this should
(a) not ask about the generic power sequencing support at all, and
just select if if a driver that is enabled needs it
OR
(b) it should ask about power sequencing support and then if you say
"N", it should not ask about the drivers.
But asking *twice* is definitely not kosher.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists