linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.9 19/22] fs: better handle deep ancestor chains in is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240716142519.2712487-19-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:24:26 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.9 19/22] fs: better handle deep ancestor chains in is_subdir()

From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit 391b59b045004d5b985d033263ccba3e941a7740 ]

Jan reported that 'cd ..' may take a long time in deep directory
hierarchies under a bind-mount. If concurrent renames happen it is
possible to livelock in is_subdir() because it will keep retrying.

Change is_subdir() from simply retrying over and over to retry once and
then acquire the rename lock to handle deep ancestor chains better. The
list of alternatives to this approach were less then pleasant. Change
the scope of rcu lock to cover the whole walk while at it.

A big thanks to Jan and Linus. Both Jan and Linus had proposed
effectively the same thing just that one version ended up being slightly
more elegant.

Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/dcache.c | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 71a8e943a0fa5..e38d2d6a37e12 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -3029,28 +3029,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_splice_alias);
   
 bool is_subdir(struct dentry *new_dentry, struct dentry *old_dentry)
 {
-	bool result;
+	bool subdir;
 	unsigned seq;
 
 	if (new_dentry == old_dentry)
 		return true;
 
-	do {
-		/* for restarting inner loop in case of seq retry */
-		seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
-		/*
-		 * Need rcu_readlock to protect against the d_parent trashing
-		 * due to d_move
-		 */
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		if (d_ancestor(old_dentry, new_dentry))
-			result = true;
-		else
-			result = false;
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-	} while (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq));
-
-	return result;
+	/* Access d_parent under rcu as d_move() may change it. */
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
+	subdir = d_ancestor(old_dentry, new_dentry);
+	 /* Try lockless once... */
+	if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq)) {
+		/* ...else acquire lock for progress even on deep chains. */
+		read_seqlock_excl(&rename_lock);
+		subdir = d_ancestor(old_dentry, new_dentry);
+		read_sequnlock_excl(&rename_lock);
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return subdir;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_subdir);
 
-- 
2.43.0