[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240716142713.2712998-8-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:26:43 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>,
syzbot+b7f6f8c9303466e16c8a@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
marcel@...tmann.org,
johan.hedberg@...il.com,
luiz.dentz@...il.com,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 08/18] bluetooth/l2cap: sync sock recv cb and release
From: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
[ Upstream commit 89e856e124f9ae548572c56b1b70c2255705f8fe ]
The problem occurs between the system call to close the sock and hci_rx_work,
where the former releases the sock and the latter accesses it without lock protection.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
sock_close hci_rx_work
l2cap_sock_release hci_acldata_packet
l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_recv_frame
sk_free l2cap_conless_channel
l2cap_sock_recv_cb
If hci_rx_work processes the data that needs to be received before the sock is
closed, then everything is normal; Otherwise, the work thread may access the
released sock when receiving data.
Add a chan mutex in the rx callback of the sock to achieve synchronization between
the sock release and recv cb.
Sock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid others use invalid sock pointer.
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b7f6f8c9303466e16c8a@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
index 97d0a0f5829a6..ae19d5deba3ae 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
@@ -1250,6 +1250,10 @@ static void l2cap_sock_kill(struct sock *sk)
BT_DBG("sk %p state %s", sk, state_to_string(sk->sk_state));
+ /* Sock is dead, so set chan data to NULL, avoid other task use invalid
+ * sock pointer.
+ */
+ l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->data = NULL;
/* Kill poor orphan */
l2cap_chan_put(l2cap_pi(sk)->chan);
@@ -1492,12 +1496,25 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
static int l2cap_sock_recv_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct sock *sk = chan->data;
- struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
+ struct sock *sk;
+ struct l2cap_pinfo *pi;
int err;
- lock_sock(sk);
+ /* To avoid race with sock_release, a chan lock needs to be added here
+ * to synchronize the sock.
+ */
+ l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
+ l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
+ sk = chan->data;
+ if (!sk) {
+ l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
+ l2cap_chan_put(chan);
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
+ lock_sock(sk);
if (chan->mode == L2CAP_MODE_ERTM && !list_empty(&pi->rx_busy)) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto done;
@@ -1546,6 +1563,8 @@ static int l2cap_sock_recv_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
done:
release_sock(sk);
+ l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
+ l2cap_chan_put(chan);
return err;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists