[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240716142920.2713829-4-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:29:06 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@...wei.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
yanaijie@...wei.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org,
yuehaibing@...wei.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 4/9] scsi: libsas: Fix exp-attached device scan after probe failure scanned in again after probe failed
From: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit ab2068a6fb84751836a84c26ca72b3beb349619d ]
The expander phy will be treated as broadcast flutter in the next
revalidation after the exp-attached end device probe failed, as follows:
[78779.654026] sas: broadcast received: 0
[78779.654037] sas: REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10
[78779.654680] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 change count has changed
[78779.662977] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 originated BROADCAST(CHANGE)
[78779.662986] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 new device attached
[78779.663079] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05:U:8 attached: 500e004aaaaaaa05 (stp)
[78779.693542] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: dev[16:5] found
[78779.701155] sas: done REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10, res 0x0
[78779.707864] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
...
[78835.161307] sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1
[78835.171344] sas: sas_probe_sata: for exp-attached device 500e004aaaaaaa05 returned -19
[78835.180879] hisi_sas_v3_hw 0000:b4:02.0: dev[16:5] is gone
[78835.187487] sas: broadcast received: 0
[78835.187504] sas: REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10
[78835.188263] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 change count has changed
[78835.195870] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 originated BROADCAST(CHANGE)
[78835.195875] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f rediscovering phy05
[78835.196022] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05:U:A attached: 500e004aaaaaaa05 (stp)
[78835.196026] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy05 broadcast flutter
[78835.197615] sas: done REVALIDATING DOMAIN on port 0, pid:10, res 0x0
The cause of the problem is that the related ex_phy's attached_sas_addr was
not cleared after the end device probe failed, so reset it.
Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240619091742.25465-1-yangxingui@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
index d7a1fb5c10c6e..5028bc394c4f9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_internal.h
@@ -111,6 +111,20 @@ static inline void sas_fail_probe(struct domain_device *dev, const char *func, i
func, dev->parent ? "exp-attached" :
"direct-attached",
SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), err);
+
+ /*
+ * If the device probe failed, the expander phy attached address
+ * needs to be reset so that the phy will not be treated as flutter
+ * in the next revalidation
+ */
+ if (dev->parent && !dev_is_expander(dev->dev_type)) {
+ struct sas_phy *phy = dev->phy;
+ struct domain_device *parent = dev->parent;
+ struct ex_phy *ex_phy = &parent->ex_dev.ex_phy[phy->number];
+
+ memset(ex_phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE);
+ }
+
sas_unregister_dev(dev->port, dev);
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists