lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7318bebe448e88603f5e86bf1bb7f43dce4ce8dc.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:53:07 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Yamahata, Isaku"
	<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC: "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
	<seanjc@...gle.com>, "isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow per VM kvm_mmu_max_gfn()

On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 18:21 -0700, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
> 
> Prepare for TDX support by making kvm_mmu_max_gfn() configurable.  Have
> this preparation also be useful by non-TDX changes to improve correctness
> associated with the combination of 4-level EPT and MAXPA > 48.  The issue
> is analyzed at [1].

It looks like the part where you were going to describe the TDX and other
testing got left off, can elaborate?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ