lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <MA0P287MB28228BA5CC8B6F61A4C237E9FEA32@MA0P287MB2822.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:05:10 +0800
From: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Haylen Chu <heylenay@...look.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: sophgo,cv1800-thermal: Add
 Sophgo CV1800 thermal


On 2024/7/16 23:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 08:43:19PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>> On 2024/7/16 17:42, Haylen Chu wrote:
>>> Add devicetree binding documentation for thermal sensors integrated in
>>> Sophgo CV180X SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haylen Chu <heylenay@...look.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml        | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>> I see sometimes you call it cv1800, and in patch 3, the file name is
>> cv180x_thermal.c, and for dts changes, you changed cv18xx.dtsi. Please unify
>> it.
>>
>> I think sg200x is new name for cv181x serias, so if you want to cover
>> cv180x/sg200x, is cv18xx better?
>>
>>>    1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..58bd4432cd10
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sophgo,cv1800-thermal.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Sophgo CV1800 on-SoC Thermal Sensor
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Haylen Chu <heylenay@...look.com>
>>> +
>>> +description: Sophgo CV1800 on-SoC thermal sensor
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - sophgo,cv1800-thermal
>> cv18xx-thermal ?
> Please, no wildcards in compatibles :/

Sorry for my confusion.

Haylen, so you want a compatible that matches an actual SoC and use it 
everywhere?

Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800.


[......]



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ