linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wigjHuE2OPyuT6GK66BcQSAukSp0sm8vYvVJeB7+V+ecQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:53:04 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs changes for 6.11

On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at 18:26, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Linus - another opossum for the posse:

(The kernel naming tends to be related to some random event, in this
case we had a family of opossums under our shed for a couple of
months)

> bcachefs changes for 6.11-rc1

As Stephen pointed out, all of this seems to have been rebased
basically as the merge window opened, so if it was in linux-next, I
certainly can't easily validate it without having to compare patch ids
etc. DON'T DO THIS.

Also, the changes to outside fs/bcachefs had questions that weren't answered.

So I'm just dropping this all for now.

            Linus