lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240717130030.09a778a38aae6a23a193b357@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:00:30 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@...el.com>,
 "peili.dev@...il.com" <peili.dev@...il.com>, "Nikula, Jani"
 <jani.nikula@...el.com>, "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@...el.com>,
 "Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@...el.com>,
 "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240712)

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:00:58 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:

> > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a fix if necessary?
> 
> This is know.
> 
> There is a discussion along the original patch [1] on how to do it 
> differently. But likely we'll tackle it differently [2]. So this patch 
> should be dropped for -- which I think already happened because I cannot 
> spot that patch in mm-unstable anymore.

Yes, I dropped it on July 15.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ