linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Paravirt Scheduling (Dynamic vcpu priority management)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSpaKJg_7eHf4MeEFMASR_rJ9JoRfDPogsB4_66YA2abA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:57:43 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, 
	Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, 
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, 
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, 
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, 
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, 
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, himadrics@...ia.fr, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, 
	graf@...zon.com, drjunior.org@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Paravirt Scheduling (Dynamic vcpu priority management)

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:20 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 10:52:33 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > We could possibly add a new sched class that has a dynamic priority.
>
> It wouldn't need to be a new sched class. This could work with just a
> task_struct flag.
>
> It would only need to be checked in pick_next_task() and
> try_to_wake_up(). It would require that the shared memory has to be
> allocated by the host kernel and always present (unlike rseq). But this
> coming from a virtio device driver, that shouldn't be a problem.

Problem is its not only about preemption, if we set the vCPU boosted
to RT class, and another RT task is already running on the same CPU,
then the vCPU thread should get migrated to different CPU. We can't do
that I think if we just did it without doing a proper
sched_setscheduler() / sched_setattr() and let the scheduler handle
things.  Vineeth's patches was doing that in VMEXIT..

 - Joel