lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202407171517.EC9EE07@keescook>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:19:05 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
	oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fortify: use if_changed_dep to record header
 dependency in *.cmd files

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:46:32PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Masahiro,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> > [also build test ERROR on v6.10 next-20240716]
> > [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable kees/for-next/hardening kees/for-next/pstore kees/for-next/kspp]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Masahiro-Yamada/fortify-use-if_changed_dep-to-record-header-dependency-in-cmd-files/20240715-224820
> > base:   linus/master
> > patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240715144529.101634-2-masahiroy%40kernel.org
> > patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] fortify: use if_changed_dep to record header dependency in *.cmd files
> > config: i386-randconfig-004-20240716 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240717/202407170104.dCe5MKsA-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240717/202407170104.dCe5MKsA-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407170104.dCe5MKsA-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.write_overflow-memcpy.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.read_overflow2-memcmp.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.read_overflow-memchr.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.write_overflow-strcpy-lit.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.read_overflow2-memmove.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.write_overflow-strncpy-src.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.read_overflow-memcmp.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.read_overflow-memscan.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.write_overflow-strcpy.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.write_overflow-memmove.log.d: No such file or directory
> > --
> > >> fixdep: error opening file: lib/test_fortify/.write_overflow-memset.log.d: No such file or directory
> > ..
> 
> 
> 
> This issue seems to occur with GCC <=7
> 
> 
> $ echo 'void b(void) __attribute__((__error__(""))); void a(void) {
> b(); }' | gcc -Wp,-MMD,test.d -c -o /dev/null -x c -
> 
> 
> did not create *.d with GCC <= 7.
> 
> I do not see the issue with GCC >= 8 or Clang.

Any idea why this happens here and not for other sources in the tree?

> One quick solution is to skip the test for GCC <= 7.

I'd be fine with that -- it is designed to catch regressions/misbehaviours
in newly release compilers so I don't mind dropping checks against older
versions.

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ