[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SEYPR01MB4221940059E23BCD8BA75125D7A32@SEYPR01MB4221.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:19:07 +0000
From: Haylen Chu <heylenay@...look.com>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: sophgo,cv1800-thermal: Add
Sophgo CV1800 thermal
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:05:10AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> Haylen, so you want a compatible that matches an actual SoC and use it
> everywhere?
>
> Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800.
I would prefer "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" and use it everywhere. I don't
see any difference on thermal sensors between cv18xx-series SoCs.
Best regards,
Haylen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists