linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/66] 4.19.318-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024071751-operator-tipoff-9cb9@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:21:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/66] 4.19.318-rc1 review

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 02:30:54AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 21:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.318 release.
> > There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:27:21 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.318-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> The 390 builds failed on 6.6, 6.1, 5.15, 5.10, 5.4 and 4.19
> 
> 
> * s390, build
>   - clang-18-allnoconfig
>   - clang-18-defconfig
>   - clang-18-tinyconfig
>   - clang-nightly-allnoconfig
>   - clang-nightly-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-12-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-12-defconfig
>   - gcc-12-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-8-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
>   - gcc-8-tinyconfig
> 
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Build log:
> -------
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h: In function '__load_psw_mask':
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:292:19: error: expected '=', ',',
> ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '__uninitialized'
>   292 |         psw_t psw __uninitialized;
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:292:19: error: '__uninitialized'
> undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean
> 'uninitialized_var'?
>   292 |         psw_t psw __uninitialized;
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                   uninitialized_var
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:292:19: note: each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:293:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids
> mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
>   293 |         unsigned long addr;
>       |         ^~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:295:9: error: 'psw' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'psw_t'?
>   295 |         psw.mask = mask;
>       |         ^~~
>       |         psw_t
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> ----------
> # tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-12
> --kconfig tinyconfig

Offending commit now dropped.

thanks,

greg k-h