[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024071724-wham-contest-04a6@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:22:42 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/108] 5.10.222-rc1 review
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 02:17:51AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 21:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.222 release.
> > There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:27:21 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.222-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> The 390 builds failed on stable-rc 5.10.222-rc1 review; it has been
> reported on 6.6, 6.1, 5.15 and now on 5.10.
>
> Started from this round of stable rc on 5.10.222-rc1
>
> Good:6db6c4ec363b ("Linux 5.10.221-rc2")
> BAD: 4ec8d630a600 ("Linux 5.10.222-rc1")
>
> * s390, build
> - clang-18-allnoconfig
> - clang-18-defconfig
> - clang-18-tinyconfig
> - clang-nightly-allnoconfig
> - clang-nightly-defconfig
> - clang-nightly-tinyconfig
> - gcc-12-allnoconfig
> - gcc-12-defconfig
> - gcc-12-tinyconfig
> - gcc-8-allnoconfig
> - gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
> - gcc-8-tinyconfig
>
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Build log:
> -------
> linux/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h: In function '__load_psw_mask':
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: error: expected '=', ',',
> ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '__uninitialized'
> 255 | psw_t psw __uninitialized;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: error: '__uninitialized'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: note: each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:256:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids
> mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
> 256 | unsigned long addr;
> | ^~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:258:9: error: 'psw' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'psw_t'?
> 258 | psw.mask = mask;
> | ^~~
> | psw_t
Should now be fixed, will push out -rc2 releases later today with the
attempted resolution.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists