[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aee6eff4-4421-4122-be97-f258cfaa9f43@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:12:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Haylen Chu <heylenay@...look.com>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: thermal: sophgo,cv1800-thermal: Add
Sophgo CV1800 thermal
On 17/07/2024 07:19, Haylen Chu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:05:10AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>> Haylen, so you want a compatible that matches an actual SoC and use it
>> everywhere?
>>
>> Or we can add ones for each SoC and have a fallback to cv1800.
>
> I would prefer "sophgo,cv1800-thermal" and use it everywhere. I don't
> see any difference on thermal sensors between cv18xx-series SoCs.
Please use proper fallbacks - there is a very specific rule, repeated
many times:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L42
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists