[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240717094907.GAZpeTk403VSYORXOH@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 11:49:07 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 07:33:12PM -0700, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> linux-next branch of linux-pm tree needs to be rebased to Linus's tree.
Why?
You resolve the merge conflict and show Linus the resolution when sending the
pull request.
Rebasing is a no-no.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists