linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: qcom: fold dispcc-sm8650 info dispcc-sm8550

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e47883df-7464-4194-bc6c-7399dcea7466@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:12:12 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: qcom: fold dispcc-sm8650 info dispcc-sm8550

On 17.07.2024 12:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> There is a very minor difference between display clock controller
> drivers for SM8550 and SM8650 platforms. Fold the second one into the
> first one to reduce kernel footprint. The bindings for these two
> hardware blocks are fully compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>

Konrad