lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce14800d-7411-47c5-ad46-6baa6fb678f4@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:11:02 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: camcc-sc8280xp: Remove always-on GDSC
 hard-coding

On 17/07/2024 12:08, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>> How would it break ?
>>
>> We park the clock to XO it never gets turned off this way.
>>
> 
> Parking the parent at XO doesn't ensure the branch clock is always on, 
> it can be disabled by consumers or CCF if modelled.
> 
> If the CCF disables this clock in late init, then the clock stays in 
> disabled state until it is enabled again explicitly. Hence it is 
> recommended to not model such always-on clocks.

What is the use-case to keep that clock always-on unless/util someone 
wants camss ?

I've tested this patch on sc8280xp and it works just fine.

---
bod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ