[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3faf976d-52ee-4fc7-ad42-70fc0dc53de4@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 19:18:44 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Sync se's load_avg with cfs_rq in
reweight_entity
On 2024/7/16 23:08, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> In reweight_entity(), if !se->on_rq (e.g. when we are reweighting a
> sleeping task), we should sync the load_avg of se to cfs_rq before calling
> dequeue_load_avg(). Otherwise, the load_avg of this se can be inaccurate.
Good catch!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 9057584ec06d..2807f6e72ad1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3782,6 +3782,8 @@ static void reweight_eevdf(struct sched_entity *se, u64 avruntime,
> se->deadline = avruntime + vslice;
> }
>
> +static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags);
> +
> static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
> unsigned long weight)
> {
> @@ -3795,7 +3797,11 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
> if (!curr)
> __dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
> update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
> + } else {
> + /* Sync with the cfs_rq before removing our load_avg */
> + update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0);
I think it's suboptimal to update_load_avg() here unconditionally.
Because reweight_entity() has two types of usages:
1. group se, which uses reweight_entity() in update_cfs_group(), which
should already update_load_avg(), so should have no problem.
2. task se, which uses reweight_entity() in reweight_task(), which
should be fixed for sleep task entity as you described above.
So IMHO, we should only update_load_avg() or sync_entity_load_avg() in
reweight_task(), right?
> }
> +
> dequeue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>
> if (se->on_rq) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists