linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: mark "FORCE" target as secondary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8333c062-a773-45d3-88d3-ba78e8abbd47@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:24:35 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
 "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
 linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
 "Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@...sle.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: mark "FORCE" target as secondary

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 17:18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Of course, NACK.
>
> Now I am surprised that this broken series was quickly merged
> into the mainline.
> I really dislike how you changed scripts/Makefile.asm-headers
>
>
> I will send a correct fix.
> Please do not break Kbuild even further.

Should we maybe revert ff96f5c6971c..3db80c999deb then
and find a better way to do it in 6.12?

      Arnd