| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZpfxUvIx+0ClOqCc@andrea>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:29:06 +0200
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] riscv: Add qspinlock support
> +config RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
I'm seeing the following warnings with CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS=y:
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/qspinlock.h:1,
from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:24:
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:144:9: warning: "arch_spin_is_locked" redefined
144 | #define arch_spin_is_locked(l) queued_spin_is_locked(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/ticket_spinlock.h:1,
from ./arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h:33,
from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:95,
from ./include/linux/sched.h:2142,
from ./include/linux/percpu.h:13,
from kernel/locking/qspinlock.c:19:
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:97:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
97 | #define arch_spin_is_locked(l) ticket_spin_is_locked(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:145:9: warning: "arch_spin_is_contended" redefined
145 | #define arch_spin_is_contended(l) queued_spin_is_contended(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:98:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
98 | #define arch_spin_is_contended(l) ticket_spin_is_contended(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:146:9: warning: "arch_spin_value_unlocked" redefined
146 | #define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l) queued_spin_value_unlocked(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:99:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
99 | #define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l) ticket_spin_value_unlocked(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:147:9: warning: "arch_spin_lock" redefined
147 | #define arch_spin_lock(l) queued_spin_lock(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:100:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
100 | #define arch_spin_lock(l) ticket_spin_lock(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:148:9: warning: "arch_spin_trylock" redefined
148 | #define arch_spin_trylock(l) queued_spin_trylock(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:101:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
101 | #define arch_spin_trylock(l) ticket_spin_trylock(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:149:9: warning: "arch_spin_unlock" redefined
149 | #define arch_spin_unlock(l) queued_spin_unlock(l)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h:102:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
102 | #define arch_spin_unlock(l) ticket_spin_unlock(l)
The following diff resolves them for me (please double check):
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 4856d50006f28..2d59f56a9e2d1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -30,7 +30,11 @@ SPINLOCK_BASE_DECLARE(value_unlocked, int, arch_spinlock_t)
#else
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_SPINLOCKS)
#include <asm/ticket_spinlock.h>
+#elif defined(CONFIG_RISCV_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS)
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
+#endif
#endif
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qspinlock_key);
> +
> +static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
> +{
> + char *using_ext;
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZABHA)) {
> + using_ext = "using Zabha";
> +
> + asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %[no_zacas]", "nop", 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS, 1)
> + : : : : no_zacas);
> + asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %[qspinlock]", 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZABHA, 1)
> + : : : : qspinlock);
> + }
> +
> +no_zacas:
> + using_ext = "using Ziccrse";
> + asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "j %[qspinlock]", 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCRSE, 1)
> + : : : : qspinlock);
> +
> + static_branch_disable(&qspinlock_key);
> + pr_info("Ticket spinlock: enabled\n");
> +
> + return;
> +
> +qspinlock:
> + pr_info("Queued spinlock %s: enabled\n", using_ext);
> +}
> +
Your commit message suggests that riscv_spinlock_init() doesn't need to
do anything if CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS=n:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index d7c31c9b8ead2..b2be1b0b700d2 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void __init parse_dtb(void)
#endif
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_COMBO_SPINLOCKS)
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(qspinlock_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(qspinlock_key);
@@ -275,6 +276,11 @@ static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
qspinlock:
pr_info("Queued spinlock %s: enabled\n", using_ext);
}
+#else
+static void __init riscv_spinlock_init(void)
+{
+}
+#endif
extern void __init init_rt_signal_env(void);
Makes sense? What am I missing?
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists