lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240717164203.GA21307@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:42:03 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, chandan.babu@...cle.com,
	djwong@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	catherine.hoang@...cle.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] xfs: Unmap blocks according to forcealign

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 04:24:28PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>>>> new logic to it this might indeed be a good time.
>>> ok, I'll see if can come up with something
>> I can take a look too. 
>
> I was wondering what you plans are for any clean-up/refactoring here, as 
> mentioned?

Try to split all the convert left over of large rtextent / allocation
size logic out of __xfs_bunmapi and into a separate helper or two.
I started on it after writing that previous mail, but it has been
preempted by more urgent work for now.

> I was starting to look at the whole "if (forcealign) else if (big rt)" flow 
> refactoring in this series to use xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize(); however, I 
> figure that you have plans wider in scope, which affects this.

It will create a bit of conflict, but nothing out of ordinary.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ