linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/15] net: jme: Convert tasklet API to new bottom half workqueue mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMdWSK2M72g_4O+ofUr3foaEc3ZGCnVFu7jZEA41NXck8Xsxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:55:21 -0700
From: Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, Guo-Fu Tseng <cooldavid@...ldavid.org>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, jes@...ined-monkey.org, 
	kda@...ux-powerpc.org, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev, dougmill@...ux.ibm.com, 
	npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, 
	naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, nnac123@...ux.ibm.com, tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com, 
	marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com, mlindner@...vell.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, 
	nbd@....name, sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, 
	lorenzo@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, 
	angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, borisp@...dia.com, 
	bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, 
	louis.peens@...igine.com, richardcochran@...il.com, 
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acenic@...site.dk, linux-net-drivers@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] net: jme: Convert tasklet API to new bottom half
 workqueue mechanism

> > Thank you very much. Will send out v3 later today with these changes.
> > Note, it will be as follows, enable_work() does not have workqueue type.
> >
> > +  if (jme->rxempty_bh_work_queued)
> > +                 enable_and_queue_work(system_bh_wq, &jme->rxempty_bh_work);
> > +         else
> > -                 enable_work(system_bh_wq, &jme->rxempty_bh_work);
> > +                enable_work(&jme->rxempty_bh_work);
>
> Yup, sorry I was very hasty.
>
> More important topic: net-next is currently closed for the merge window,
> You will have to wait to post the new revision of this series until we
> re-open net-next in ~2w.
>

Noted. And Thank you for the heads up.
Meanwhile, I will prepare the second series which can go out for review in
two weeks.

Thanks.


       - Allen