[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpgERphu--gPn235@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 07:49:58 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Zhangqiao (2012 lab)" <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
Cc: void@...ifault.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH sched_ext/for-6.11] sched_ext: Reverting @p->sched_class
if @p->disallow is set
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:01:13AM +0800, Zhangqiao (2012 lab) wrote:
> > Ah, I see what you mean. I was referring to the classs switching operations
> > in scx_ops_enable(). You're looking at the fork path. I don't think we can
>
> Yes, i was referring to the fork path.
>
> > switch sched_class at that point and the .disallow mechanism is there to
> > allow the scheduler to filter out tasks on scheduler start. I'll update the
> > code so that .disallow is only allowed during the initial attach.
So, something like this.
Thanks.
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/ext.h b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
index 593d2f4909dd..a4aa516cee7d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/ext.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/ext.h
@@ -181,11 +181,12 @@ struct sched_ext_entity {
* If set, reject future sched_setscheduler(2) calls updating the policy
* to %SCHED_EXT with -%EACCES.
*
- * If set from ops.init_task() and the task's policy is already
- * %SCHED_EXT, which can happen while the BPF scheduler is being loaded
- * or by inhering the parent's policy during fork, the task's policy is
- * rejected and forcefully reverted to %SCHED_NORMAL. The number of
- * such events are reported through /sys/kernel/debug/sched_ext::nr_rejected.
+ * Can be set from ops.init_task() while the BPF scheduler is being
+ * loaded (!scx_init_task_args->fork). If set and the task's policy is
+ * already %SCHED_EXT, the task's policy is rejected and forcefully
+ * reverted to %SCHED_NORMAL. The number of such events are reported
+ * through /sys/kernel/debug/sched_ext::nr_rejected. Setting this flag
+ * during fork is not allowed.
*/
bool disallow; /* reject switching into SCX */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index da9cac6b6cc2..cf60474efa75 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -3399,18 +3399,17 @@ static int scx_ops_init_task(struct task_struct *p, struct task_group *tg, bool
scx_set_task_state(p, SCX_TASK_INIT);
- if (p->scx.disallow) {
+ if (!fork && p->scx.disallow) {
struct rq *rq;
struct rq_flags rf;
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
/*
- * We're either in fork or load path and @p->policy will be
- * applied right after. Reverting @p->policy here and rejecting
- * %SCHED_EXT transitions from scx_check_setscheduler()
- * guarantees that if ops.init_task() sets @p->disallow, @p can
- * never be in SCX.
+ * We're in the load path and @p->policy will be applied right
+ * after. Reverting @p->policy here and rejecting %SCHED_EXT
+ * transitions from scx_check_setscheduler() guarantees that if
+ * ops.init_task() sets @p->disallow, @p can never be in SCX.
*/
if (p->policy == SCHED_EXT) {
p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
@@ -3418,6 +3417,9 @@ static int scx_ops_init_task(struct task_struct *p, struct task_group *tg, bool
}
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
+ } else if (p->scx.disallow) {
+ scx_ops_error("ops.init_task() set task->scx.disallow for %s[%d] during fork",
+ p->comm, p->pid);
}
p->scx.flags |= SCX_TASK_RESET_RUNNABLE_AT;
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists