lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1ae3a0c-5a58-4ed5-94c1-d64c512cc87c@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:22:06 +0800
From: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach
	<mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan
	<leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] coresight: Add source filtering for multi-port
 output


On 7/11/2024 9:05 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 11/07/2024 09:17, Tao Zhang wrote:
>> In order to enable the output ports of multi-port output devices,
>
> This has nothing to do with multi-port. You wanted to pain the picture
> of a multi-port device, while the reality is different.
>
>> such as static replicator, to correspond to designated sources,
>> a mechanism for filtering data sources is introduced for the
>> output ports.
>>
>> The specified source will be marked like below in the Devicetree.
>> test-replicator {
>>      ... ... ... ...
>>      out-ports {
>>          ... ... ... ...
>>          port@0 {
>>              reg = <0>;
>>              xxx: endpoint {
>>                  remote-endpoint = <&xxx>;
>>                  filter_src = <&xxx>; <-- To specify the source to
>>              };                           be filtered out here.
>>          };
>>
>>          port@1 {
>>              reg = <1>;
>>              yyy: endpoint {
>>                  remote-endpoint = <&yyy>;
>>                  filter_src = <&yyy>; <-- To specify the source to
>>              };                           be filtered out here.
>>          };
>>      };
>> };
>>
>> Then driver will find the expected source marked in the Devicetree, and
>> save it to the coresight path. When the function needs to filter the
>> source, it could obtain it from coresight path parameter. Finally,
>> the output port knows which source it corresponds to, and it also knows
>> which input port it corresponds to.
>
> Minor nit: I think the commit description is full of "How" you are 
> doing something, while it must rather be: "What and Why?"
>
> I would prefer something like :
>
> Subject: coresight: Add support for trace filtering by source
>
> Some replicators have hard coded filtering of "trace" data, based on the
> source device. This is different from the trace filtering based on
> TraceID, available in the standard programmable replicators. e.g.,
> Qualcomm replicators have filtering based on custom trace protocol
> format and is not programmable.
>
> The source device could be connected to the replicator via intermediate
> components (e.g., a funnel). Thus we need platform information from
> the firmware tables to decide the source device corresponding to a
> given output port from the replicator. Given this affects "trace
> path building" and traversing the path back from the sink to source,
> add the concept of "filtering by source" to the generic coresight
> connection.
>
I will update according to your comments to the next version.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c  | 125 ++++++++++++++++--
>>   .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c  |  18 +++
>>   include/linux/coresight.h                     |   5 +
>>   3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> index 9fc6f6b863e0..3f02a31b9328 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
>> @@ -75,15 +75,60 @@ struct coresight_device 
>> *coresight_get_percpu_sink(int cpu)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(coresight_get_percpu_sink);
>>   +static struct coresight_device *coresight_get_source(struct 
>> list_head *path)
>> +{
>> +    struct coresight_device *csdev;
>> +
>> +    if (!path)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    csdev = list_first_entry(path, struct coresight_node, link)->csdev;
>> +    if (csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE)
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    return csdev;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Why is this still here ? Didn't agree to remove this and pass the source
> directly ?

I agree pass the source directly, but how can we get the source device 
of the path

without this function? The solution I can think of is to pass source 
directly from

"coresight_enable"like below.

coresight_enable ---pass source---> coresight_enable_path -> 
coresight_enable_link

-> coresight_find_out_connection -> coresight_blocks_source

Does this solution meet your expectations? Or do you have a better 
suggestion?

>
>> +/**
>> + * coresight_source_filter - checks whether the connection matches 
>> the source
>> + * of path if connection is binded to specific source.
>> + * @trace_source: The source device of the trace path
>> + * @conn:      The connection of one outport
>> + *
>> + * Return zero if the connection doesn't have a source binded or 
>> source of the
>> + * path matches the source binds to connection.
>> + */
>> +static int coresight_source_filter(struct coresight_device 
>> *trace_source,
>> +            struct coresight_connection *conn)
>
> This name is a bit confusing. It doesn't tell you, whether it
> allows the trace or blocks it.
>
>> +{
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    if (!conn->filter_src_dev)
>> +        return ret;
>
> This is not the correct check. It must be :
>
> if (!conn->filter_src_fwnode)
>
> Because, the device could have disappeared (or not appeared yet). 
> e.g., (TPDM) driver module unloaded/not - loaded.
>
>> +
>> +    if (!trace_source)
>
> Is that possible ?
>
>> +        return -1;
>> +
>> +    if (conn->filter_src_dev == trace_source)
>> +        ret = 0;
>> +    else
>> +        ret = -1;
>
> Couldn't this simply be :
>
> /*
>  * Returns true, if the trace path is not possible through @conn
>  * for trace originating from @src
>  */
> static bool coresight_blocks_source(src, conn)
> {
>     return conn->filter_src_fwnode &&
>         (conn->filter_src_dev != src);
> }
I will update to the next version.
>
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static struct coresight_connection *
>>   coresight_find_out_connection(struct coresight_device *src_dev,
>> -                  struct coresight_device *dest_dev)
>> +                  struct coresight_device *dest_dev,
>> +                  struct coresight_device *trace_source)
>
> Please could you rename :
>
>     src_dev => csdev
>     dest_dev => out_dev
>     trace_source => trace_src ?
>
> Having src_dev and trace_source in the same list is confusing.
I will update to the next version.
>
>>   {
>>       int i;
>>       struct coresight_connection *conn;
>>         for (i = 0; i < src_dev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++) {
>>           conn = src_dev->pdata->out_conns[i];
>> +        if (coresight_source_filter(trace_source, conn))
>
>         if (coresight_blocks_source(trace_source, conn))
>             continue;
>
>> +            continue;
>>           if (conn->dest_dev == dest_dev)
>>               return conn;
>>       }
>> @@ -251,7 +296,8 @@ static void coresight_disable_sink(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>     static int coresight_enable_link(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>                    struct coresight_device *parent,
>> -                 struct coresight_device *child)
>> +                 struct coresight_device *child,
>> +                 struct coresight_device *trace_source)
>>   {
>>       int link_subtype;
>>       struct coresight_connection *inconn, *outconn;
>> @@ -259,8 +305,8 @@ static int coresight_enable_link(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>       if (!parent || !child)
>>           return -EINVAL;
>>   -    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, csdev);
>> -    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child);
>> +    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, csdev, 
>> trace_source);
>> +    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child, 
>> trace_source);
>>       link_subtype = csdev->subtype.link_subtype;
>>         if (link_subtype == CORESIGHT_DEV_SUBTYPE_LINK_MERG && 
>> IS_ERR(inconn))
>> @@ -273,15 +319,16 @@ static int coresight_enable_link(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>     static void coresight_disable_link(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>                      struct coresight_device *parent,
>> -                   struct coresight_device *child)
>> +                   struct coresight_device *child,
>> +                   struct coresight_device *trace_source)
>>   {
>>       struct coresight_connection *inconn, *outconn;
>>         if (!parent || !child)
>>           return;
>>   -    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, csdev);
>> -    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child);
>> +    inconn = coresight_find_out_connection(parent, csdev, 
>> trace_source);
>> +    outconn = coresight_find_out_connection(csdev, child, 
>> trace_source);
>>         link_ops(csdev)->disable(csdev, inconn, outconn);
>>   }
>> @@ -341,6 +388,9 @@ static void coresight_disable_path_from(struct 
>> list_head *path,
>>   {
>>       u32 type;
>>       struct coresight_device *csdev, *parent, *child;
>> +    struct coresight_device *source;
>> +
>> +    source = coresight_get_source(path);
>
> Grr! This must come from the "caller of the 
> coresight_disable_path_from()", which was my comment. Please go back
> and double check the comment on previous version.

How about if I pass the source to " coresight_disable_path_from" 
directly from

"coresight_enable" or "coresight_disable" like below?

coresight_enable ----|                             |---> 
coresight_disable_patch_from

                                      |---pass source---|

coresight_disable----|                             |---> 
coresight_disable_path -> coresight_disable_patch_from

This can ensure that the source passed into coresight_disable_patch_from is

the correct source.

>
>
>>         if (!nd)
>>           nd = list_first_entry(path, struct coresight_node, link);
>> @@ -375,7 +425,7 @@ static void coresight_disable_path_from(struct 
>> list_head *path,
>>           case CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINK:
>>               parent = list_prev_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>>               child = list_next_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>> -            coresight_disable_link(csdev, parent, child);
>> +            coresight_disable_link(csdev, parent, child, source);
>>               break;
>>           default:
>>               break;
>> @@ -418,6 +468,9 @@ int coresight_enable_path(struct list_head *path, 
>> enum cs_mode mode,
>>       u32 type;
>>       struct coresight_node *nd;
>>       struct coresight_device *csdev, *parent, *child;
>> +    struct coresight_device *source;
>> +
>> +    source = coresight_get_source(path);
>>         list_for_each_entry_reverse(nd, path, link) {
>>           csdev = nd->csdev;
>> @@ -456,7 +509,7 @@ int coresight_enable_path(struct list_head *path, 
>> enum cs_mode mode,
>>           case CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINK:
>>               parent = list_prev_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>>               child = list_next_entry(nd, link)->csdev;
>> -            ret = coresight_enable_link(csdev, parent, child);
>> +            ret = coresight_enable_link(csdev, parent, child, source);
>>               if (ret)
>>                   goto err;
>>               break;
>> @@ -619,6 +672,7 @@ static void coresight_drop_device(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>    * @csdev:    The device to start from.
>>    * @sink:    The final sink we want in this path.
>>    * @path:    The list to add devices to.
>> + * @trace_source: The trace source device of the path.
>>    *
>>    * The tree of Coresight device is traversed until @sink is found.
>>    * From there the sink is added to the list along with all the 
>> devices that led
>> @@ -627,7 +681,8 @@ static void coresight_drop_device(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>    */
>>   static int _coresight_build_path(struct coresight_device *csdev,
>>                    struct coresight_device *sink,
>> -                 struct list_head *path)
>> +                 struct list_head *path,
>> +                 struct coresight_device *trace_source)
>>   {
>>       int i, ret;
>>       bool found = false;
>> @@ -639,7 +694,7 @@ static int _coresight_build_path(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>         if (coresight_is_percpu_source(csdev) && 
>> coresight_is_percpu_sink(sink) &&
>>           sink == per_cpu(csdev_sink, 
>> source_ops(csdev)->cpu_id(csdev))) {
>> -        if (_coresight_build_path(sink, sink, path) == 0) {
>> +        if (_coresight_build_path(sink, sink, path, trace_source) == 
>> 0) {
>>               found = true;
>>               goto out;
>>           }
>> @@ -650,8 +705,13 @@ static int _coresight_build_path(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>>           struct coresight_device *child_dev;
>>             child_dev = csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->dest_dev;
>> +
>> +        if (csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->filter_src_dev
>> +            && (csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->filter_src_dev != 
>> trace_source))
>> +            continue;
>> +
>>           if (child_dev &&
>> -            _coresight_build_path(child_dev, sink, path) == 0) {
>> +            _coresight_build_path(child_dev, sink, path, 
>> trace_source) == 0) {
>>               found = true;
>>               break;
>>           }
>> @@ -696,7 +756,7 @@ struct list_head *coresight_build_path(struct 
>> coresight_device *source,
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(path);
>>   -    rc = _coresight_build_path(source, sink, path);
>> +    rc = _coresight_build_path(source, sink, path, source);
>>       if (rc) {
>>           kfree(path);
>>           return ERR_PTR(rc);
>> @@ -957,6 +1017,14 @@ static int coresight_orphan_match(struct device 
>> *dev, void *data)
>>               /* This component still has an orphan */
>>               still_orphan = true;
>>           }
>
>
>> +        if ((conn->filter_src_fwnode) && dst_csdev
>> +            && (conn->filter_src_fwnode == dst_csdev->dev.fwnode)) {
>> +            conn->filter_src_dev = dst_csdev;
>> +            if (conn->filter_src_dev->type
>> +                != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE)
>> +                dev_warn(&conn->filter_src_dev->dev,
>> +                  "Filter source is not a source device\n");
>> +        }
>
> Have you tested your code with the following order :
>
> 1) Build everything as module
> 2) Load the replicator driver.
> 3) Load the TPDM driver
>
> And are you able to get the trace working ? I suspect it doesn't work. 
> The csdev->orphan must be used to track if there is any missing link
> with unresolved "filter_src_dev".

I really didn't consider this test case in my testing. There was a 
problem with

the logic of the code I modified. If it is modified to the following, 
can it solve the

test case you proposed?

static int coresight_orphan_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
     ... ... ...
     for (i = 0; i < src_csdev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++) {
         conn = src_csdev->pdata->out_conns[i];

         /*Add the following code to fix filter source device before 
skip the port*/
+        if ((conn->filter_src_fwnode) && dst_csdev
+            && (conn->filter_src_fwnode == dst_csdev->dev.fwnode)) {
+             conn->filter_src_dev = dst_csdev;
+             if (conn->filter_src_dev->type
+                 != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE)
+                 dev_warn(&conn->filter_src_dev->dev,
+                   "Filter source is not a source device\n");
+        }

         /* Skip the port if it's already connected. */
         if (conn->dest_dev)
             continue;
     ... ... ...
             ret = coresight_add_in_conn(conn);
             if (ret)
                 return ret;

               /* Add the following code to make sure the device still 
orphan if there is a

                 * filter source firmware node but the filter source is 
null.*/

+            if (conn->filter_src_fwnode && !conn->filter_src_dev)
+                still_orphan = true;
         } else {
             /* This component still has an orphan */
             still_orphan = true;
         }
     }

     src_csdev->orphan = still_orphan;
     ... ... ...
}

>
>
>>       }
>>         src_csdev->orphan = still_orphan;
>> @@ -974,6 +1042,30 @@ static int coresight_fixup_orphan_conns(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>                csdev, coresight_orphan_match);
>>   }
>>   +/* reset_filter_src - Reset the filter source if the source is 
>> being removed */
>> +static int reset_filter_src(struct coresight_device *trace_source,
>> +                struct coresight_connection *conn)
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +    int ret = -1;
>> +    struct coresight_device *csdev;
>> +    struct coresight_connection *output_conn;
>
> I don't think this is sufficient. I would rather walk through the 
> entire coresight bus and fixup the filter_src_dev, rather than 
> traversing the
> paths. e.g., one of the devices in the path could have been removed.
> See coresight_clear_default_sink() for e.g. You should have something
> similar :
>
> coresight_clear_filter_source();

That's right. My current understanding is that there are two cases that 
need to be considered.

#1 Unregister the source device

In this case, we need to walk through the entire coresight bus and fixup 
the filter_src_dev

#2 Unregister the replicator

Iterate over all output connections to set filter_src_dev and 
filter_src_fwnode to NULL.

Is this logically correct? I have attached my sample code below, please 
help review it.

+static void coresight_clear_filter_source(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+    int i;
+    struct coresight_device *source = data;
+    struct coresight_device *csdev = to_coresight_device(dev);
+
+    for (i = 0; i < csdev->pdata->nr_outconns; ++i) {
+        if (csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->filter_src_dev == source)
+            csdev->pdata->out_conns[i]->filter_src_dev = NULL;
+    }

+}

/* coresight_remove_conns - Remove other device's references to this 
device */
static void coresight_remove_conns(struct coresight_device *csdev)
{
     int i, j;
     struct coresight_connection *conn;

+    if (csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE) //walk through the 
entire coresight bus and fixup the filter_src_dev
+        bus_for_each_dev(&coresight_bustype, NULL, csdev,
+                 coresight_clear_filter_source);

     /*
      * Remove the input connection references from the destination device
      * for each output connection.
      */
     for (i = 0; i < csdev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++) {
         conn = csdev->pdata->out_conns[i];
+        if (conn->filter_src_fwnode) { //Iterate over all output 
connections to set filter_src_dev and filter_src_fwnode to NULL.
+            conn->filter_src_dev = NULL;
+            conn->filter_src_fwnode = NULL;
+        }

         if (!conn->dest_dev)
             continue;

        ... ... ...
}


Best,

Tao

>
>
> Suzuki
>
>
>
>> +
>> +    csdev = conn->dest_dev;
>> +    for (i = 0; i < csdev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++) {
>> +        output_conn = csdev->pdata->out_conns[i];
>> +        if (output_conn->filter_src_dev
>> +            && (output_conn->filter_src_dev == trace_source)) {
>> +            output_conn->filter_src_dev = NULL;
>> +            return 0;
>> +        }
>> +        ret = reset_filter_src(trace_source, output_conn);
>> +        if (!ret)
>> +            return ret;
>> +    }
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /* coresight_remove_conns - Remove other device's references to 
>> this device */
>>   static void coresight_remove_conns(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>>   {
>> @@ -986,6 +1078,13 @@ static void coresight_remove_conns(struct 
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>>        */
>
>
>>       for (i = 0; i < csdev->pdata->nr_outconns; i++) {
>>           conn = csdev->pdata->out_conns[i];
>> +        if (csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE)
>> +            reset_filter_src(csdev, conn);
>> +        if (conn->filter_src_fwnode) {
>> +            conn->filter_src_dev = NULL;
>> +            conn->filter_src_fwnode = NULL;
>> +        }
>> +
>>           if (!conn->dest_dev)
>>               continue;
>>   diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> index 64e171eaad82..b3c3e2361d07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> @@ -243,6 +243,24 @@ static int of_coresight_parse_endpoint(struct 
>> device *dev,
>>           conn.dest_fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(rdev_fwnode);
>>           conn.dest_port = rendpoint.port;
>>   +        /*
>> +         * Get the firmware node of the filter source through the
>> +         * reference. This could be used to filter the source in
>> +         * building path.
>> +         */
>> +        conn.filter_src_fwnode =
>> +            fwnode_find_reference(&ep->fwnode, "filter-src", 0);
>> +        if (IS_ERR(conn.filter_src_fwnode))
>> +            conn.filter_src_fwnode = NULL;
>> +        else {
>> +            conn.filter_src_dev =
>> + coresight_find_csdev_by_fwnode(conn.filter_src_fwnode);
>> +            if (conn.filter_src_dev && (conn.filter_src_dev->type
>> +                != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SOURCE))
>> +                dev_warn(&conn.filter_src_dev->dev,
>> +                  "Filter source %s is not a source device\n");
>> +        }
>> +
>>           new_conn = coresight_add_out_conn(dev, pdata, &conn);
>>           if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_conn)) {
>>               fwnode_handle_put(conn.dest_fwnode);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h
>> index f09ace92176e..91a689b4514b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h
>> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ struct coresight_desc {
>>    * @dest_dev:    a @coresight_device representation of the component
>>           connected to @src_port. NULL until the device is created
>>    * @link: Representation of the connection as a sysfs link.
>> + * @filter_src_fwnode: filter source component's fwnode handle.
>> + * @filter_src_dev: a @coresight_device representation of the 
>> component that
>> +        needs to be filtered.
>>    *
>>    * The full connection structure looks like this, where in_conns store
>>    * references to same connection as the source device's out_conns.
>> @@ -200,6 +203,8 @@ struct coresight_connection {
>>       struct coresight_device *dest_dev;
>>       struct coresight_sysfs_link *link;
>>       struct coresight_device *src_dev;
>> +    struct fwnode_handle *filter_src_fwnode;
>> +    struct coresight_device *filter_src_dev;
>>       atomic_t src_refcnt;
>>       atomic_t dest_refcnt;
>>   };
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ