linux-kernel - Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.11-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wir5OYeNSytz+EocQnQxoFX0LY962R6FDj9cAHBiXFe5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:24:44 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.11-rc1

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 17:22, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I have looked up said explanations, but next time I need to go look
> for explanations I'm just going to ignore the pull request as clearly
> just not worth bothering with.

Actually, I looked more, and that's just part of it.

There are other merges in there too, and this just pisses me off.

If you can't be bothered to then write a summary for what the
different merges do, I can't be bothered to pull it all.

                Linus