[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b154de51c3606406728026dc9f7efc587d7c465e.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 02:59:42 +0000
From: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
Andy Hsieh (謝智皓) <Andy.Hsieh@...iatek.com>,
"jstephan@...libre.com" <jstephan@...libre.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"paul.elder@...asonboard.com" <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "fsylvestre@...libre.com"
<fsylvestre@...libre.com>, "pnguyen@...libre.com" <pnguyen@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] media: platform: mediatek: isp_30: add mediatek
ISP3.0 camsv
Hi, Julien:
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 15:36 +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
> From: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@...libre.com>
>
> This driver provides a path to bypass the SoC ISP so that image data
> coming from the SENINF can go directly into memory without any image
> processing. This allows the use of an external ISP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@...libre.com>
> [Paul Elder fix irq locking]
> Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>
> Co-developed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Co-developed-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static void mtk_cam_cmos_vf_enable(struct mtk_cam_dev *cam_dev,
> + bool enable, bool pak_en)
> +{
> +struct device *dev = cam_dev->dev;
> +unsigned long flags;
> +
> +if (pm_runtime_get_sync(dev) < 0) {
> +dev_err(dev, "failed to get pm_runtime\n");
> +goto out;
> +}
> +
> +spin_lock_irqsave(&cam_dev->irqlock, flags);
The comment of cam_dev->irqlock is "Protects the buffer list". Why do
you protect hw_enable/hw_disable? And I think the naming of irqlock
should be changed to 'buf_list_lock'.
Regards,
CK
> +if (enable)
> +cam_dev->hw_functions->mtk_cam_cmos_vf_hw_enable(cam_dev);
> +else
> +cam_dev->hw_functions->mtk_cam_cmos_vf_hw_disable(cam_dev);
> +spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cam_dev->irqlock, flags);
> +
> +out:
> +pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists