[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240718034910.GB31912@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 05:49:10 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma: call unconditionally to unmap_page and
unmap_sg callbacks
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 03:37:10PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>
> Almost all users of ->map_page()/map_sg() callbacks implement
> ->unmap_page()/unmap_sg() callbacks too. One user which doesn't do it,
> is dummy DMA ops interface, and the use of this interface is to fail
> the operation and in such case, there won't be any call to
> ->unmap_page()/unmap_sg().
>
> This patch removes the existence checks of ->unmap_page()/unmap_sg()
> and calls to it directly to create symmetrical interface to
> ->map_page()/map_sg().
I don't think you even need this any more, do you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists