linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/109] 5.10.222-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtfAbfcQ9J9Hzq-e6yoBVG3t_iHZ=bS2eJbO_aiOcquXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:45:22 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/109] 5.10.222-rc2 review

On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 12:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.222 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 19 Jul 2024 06:37:32 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.222-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


The QEMU arm64 booting kunit enabled boot failed with clang and gcc.

Anders bisected to this as first bad commit,
# first bad commit: [c2ef31fd37ae11e89cb63c73cb7ee05bf4376455]
            arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs
            commit b89ddf4cca43f1269093942cf5c4e457fd45c335 upstream.

Reverting the above patch made the boot successful on QEMU arm64.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Boot failed log link [1]
 [1] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.221-110-g3fac7bc30eab/testrun/24635930/suite/boot/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit/log

Links to the details of build and test [2]
 [2] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.221-110-g3fac7bc30eab/testrun/24635930/suite/boot/test/gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit/details/

Steps to reproduce: [3]
[3] https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/2jMce7XoWf551plmM9TzxxlmL4t/reproducer

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.222-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 3fac7bc30eab333862a04cd97d58564bb909e518
* git describe: v5.10.221-110-g3fac7bc30eab
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.221-110-g3fac7bc30eab

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.220-285-g6db6c4ec363b)

* qemu-arm64, boot
  - clang-18-defconfig-kunit
  - gcc-12-defconfig-kunit
  - gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit
  - gcc-8-defconfig-kunit

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.220-285-g6db6c4ec363b)

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.220-285-g6db6c4ec363b)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.220-285-g6db6c4ec363b)

## Test result summary
total: 81147, pass: 65856, fail: 1631, skip: 13601, xfail: 59

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 101 total, 101 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org