linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and add 7712 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6252e83a-1cbd-469b-8209-37fa87d9358a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:07:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>, Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...e.de>,
 bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, jim2101024@...il.com
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
 <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and
 add 7712 SoC

On 17/07/2024 23:06, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 7/16/24 23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
>>>
>>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules
>>>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
>> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
>> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
>> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
> 
> Maybe the feedback was not clear, the fault cannot always be in the 
> submitter, right?

That why it is nice to ack each reviewers comment. If reviewers comments
are somehow trickier, then such acks or further clarifications are even
more useful.

Did it happen for v3? No.

Best regards,
Krzysztof