[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB84594CFA6A0E3DE2A06729AD88AC2@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:22:09 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>, "sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"cristian.marussi@....com" <cristian.marussi@....com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org"
<arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: set mailbox timeout value from
device tree
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: set mailbox timeout
> value from device tree
>
> On 18/07/2024 04:24, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Cristian,
> >
> >> Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: set mailbox timeout
> value
> >> from device tree
> >
> > The binding has got R-b from Rob, will you pick this patch in your
> > next Patchset?
>
> Please don't ping during the merge window. Is this a fix? Why shall it
> be picked up during merge window?
This is not to ask Sudeep for merge. Cristian is doing a patchset
for scmi transport, he said if the binding patch 1 got R-b, he would take
patch 2 into his scmi transport patchset to avoid conflict.
Regards,
Peng.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists