[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ed3e6c6b74ddba1bca1a719dfdf3ac4@manjaro.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:43:50 +0200
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kever Yang
<kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, Collabora Kernel Mailing List
<kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Firefly
Core-PX30-JD4 with baseboard
On 2024-07-18 10:34, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 09:31:45AM +0100, Christopher Obbard wrote:
>> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 06:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
>> > Hello Christopher,
>> >
>> > On 2024-07-17 18:46, Christopher Obbard wrote:
>> > > Add binding for the Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 SoM when used in conjunction
>> > > with the MB-JD4-RK3328 & PX30 baseboard.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > index 1ef09fbfdfaf5..33ca8028bc151 100644
>> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
>> > > @@ -148,6 +148,12 @@ properties:
>> > > - const: engicam,px30-core
>> > > - const: rockchip,px30
>> > >
>> > > + - description: Firefly Core-PX30-JD4 with MB-JD4-PX30 baseboard
>> > > + items:
>> > > + - const: firefly,px30-mb-jd4
>> > > + - const: firefly,px30-core-jd4
>> >
>> > Similarly to how I suggested the new dts(i) files to be named, [1]
>> > the model names should be named like this:
>> >
>> > - const: firefly,px30-jd4-core
>> > - const: firefly,px30-jd4-core-mb
>>
>> I suppose the order should be the other way around to match other
>> entries, e.g
>> firefly,px30-jd4-core-mb first?
>
> Yes. Mainboard first, then som, then soc.
Ah yes, sorry, I somehow managed to get the order wrong. Basically,
it goes from more specific to less specific.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists