[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240718084358.72242-12-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:13:54 +0530
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
irogers@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, segher@...nel.crashing.org,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, akanksha@...ux.ibm.com,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH V8 11/15] tools/perf: Update instruction tracking for powerpc
Add instruction tracking function "update_insn_state_powerpc" for
powerpc. Example sequence in powerpc:
ld r10,264(r3)
mr r31,r3
<<after some sequence>
ld r9,312(r31)
Consider ithe sample is pointing to: "ld r9,312(r31)".
Here the memory reference is hit at "312(r31)" where 312 is the offset
and r31 is the source register. Previous instruction sequence shows that
register state of r3 is moved to r31. So to identify the data type for r31
access, the previous instruction ("mr") needs to be tracked and the
state type entry has to be updated. Current instruction tracking support
in perf tools infrastructure is specific to x86. Patch adds this support
for powerpc as well.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
.../perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c | 9 ++-
tools/perf/util/disasm.c | 3 +
3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c
index aa25a336d8d0..af1032572bf3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c
@@ -231,6 +231,65 @@ static struct ins_ops *check_ppc_insn(u32 raw_insn)
return NULL;
}
+/*
+ * Instruction tracking function to track register state moves.
+ * Example sequence:
+ * ld r10,264(r3)
+ * mr r31,r3
+ * <<after some sequence>
+ * ld r9,312(r31)
+ *
+ * Previous instruction sequence shows that register state of r3
+ * is moved to r31. update_insn_state_powerpc tracks these state
+ * changes
+ */
+#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
+static void update_insn_state_powerpc(struct type_state *state,
+ struct data_loc_info *dloc, Dwarf_Die * cu_die __maybe_unused,
+ struct disasm_line *dl)
+{
+ struct annotated_insn_loc loc;
+ struct annotated_op_loc *src = &loc.ops[INSN_OP_SOURCE];
+ struct annotated_op_loc *dst = &loc.ops[INSN_OP_TARGET];
+ struct type_state_reg *tsr;
+ u32 insn_offset = dl->al.offset;
+
+ if (annotate_get_insn_location(dloc->arch, dl, &loc) < 0)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Value 444 for bits 21:30 is for "mr"
+ * instruction. "mr" is extended OR. So set the
+ * source and destination reg correctly
+ */
+ if (PPC_21_30(dl->raw.raw_insn) == 444) {
+ int src_reg = src->reg1;
+
+ src->reg1 = dst->reg1;
+ dst->reg1 = src_reg;
+ }
+
+ if (!has_reg_type(state, dst->reg1))
+ return;
+
+ tsr = &state->regs[dst->reg1];
+
+ if (!has_reg_type(state, src->reg1) ||
+ !state->regs[src->reg1].ok) {
+ tsr->ok = false;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ tsr->type = state->regs[src->reg1].type;
+ tsr->kind = state->regs[src->reg1].kind;
+ tsr->ok = true;
+
+ pr_debug_dtp("mov [%x] reg%d -> reg%d",
+ insn_offset, src->reg1, dst->reg1);
+ pr_debug_type_name(&tsr->type, tsr->kind);
+}
+#endif /* HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT */
+
static int powerpc__annotate_init(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid __maybe_unused)
{
if (!arch->initialized) {
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
index 7a48c3d72b89..734acdd8c4b7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
@@ -1080,6 +1080,13 @@ static int find_data_type_insn(struct data_loc_info *dloc,
return ret;
}
+static int arch_supports_insn_tracking(struct data_loc_info *dloc)
+{
+ if ((arch__is(dloc->arch, "x86")) || (arch__is(dloc->arch, "powerpc")))
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Construct a list of basic blocks for each scope with variables and try to find
* the data type by updating a type state table through instructions.
@@ -1094,7 +1101,7 @@ static int find_data_type_block(struct data_loc_info *dloc,
int ret = -1;
/* TODO: other architecture support */
- if (!arch__is(dloc->arch, "x86"))
+ if (!arch_supports_insn_tracking(dloc))
return -1;
prev_dst_ip = dst_ip = dloc->ip;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
index 801d57287a35..a839f037bdaf 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
@@ -157,6 +157,9 @@ static struct arch architectures[] = {
{
.name = "powerpc",
.init = powerpc__annotate_init,
+#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
+ .update_insn_state = update_insn_state_powerpc,
+#endif
},
{
.name = "riscv64",
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists