[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpjmWtmaiu294ca_@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:54:34 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS" <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:INTEL GVT-g DRIVERS (Intel GPU Virtualization)" <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhi Wang <zhiwang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/i915: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
Hi Easwar,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:27:31AM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/,
> fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that
> the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Zhi Wang <zhiwang@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7017.c | 14 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7xxx.c | 18 +++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ivch.c | 16 +++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ns2501.c | 18 +++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_sil164.c | 18 +++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_tfp410.c | 18 +++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 22 +++++++-------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 20 ++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c | 14 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c | 30 +++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.c | 28 ++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.h | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c | 2 +-
> 18 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
it's a complex/long patch and I want to make sure there are no
subtle errors. I will submit another round of tests and if it
convinces me, I will take it in.
The failures you see[*] are definitely not related to this patch,
but better safe safe safe than sorry sorry sorry :-)
Thanks,
Andi
[*] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131867/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists