[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240718113222.867116-2-usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:32:19 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@...labora.com,
"Chang S . Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state: remove manual counting and increase maintainability
Removes manual counting of pass and fail tests. This increases readability
of tests, but also improves maintainability of the tests. Print logs in
standard format (without [RUN], [OK] tags)
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- correct description of the patch
Changes since v2:
- Update description of the patch and add before/after output
Before:
# selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state_32
# [OK] All GPRs except SP are 0
# [OK] FLAGS is 0x202
ok 5 selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state_32
After:
# selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state_32
# TAP version 13
# 1..2
# ok 1 All GPRs except SP are 0
# ok 2 FLAGS is 0x202
# # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
ok 5 selftests: x86: check_initial_reg_state_32
---
.../selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c | 24 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c
index 3bc95f3ed5859..b91c2b06b9881 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/check_initial_reg_state.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
+#include "../kselftest.h"
unsigned long ax, bx, cx, dx, si, di, bp, sp, flags;
unsigned long r8, r9, r10, r11, r12, r13, r14, r15;
@@ -53,20 +54,19 @@ asm (
int main()
{
- int nerrs = 0;
+ ksft_print_header();
+ ksft_set_plan(2);
- if (sp == 0) {
- printf("[FAIL]\tTest was built incorrectly\n");
- return 1;
- }
+ if (sp == 0)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Test was built incorrectly\n");
if (ax || bx || cx || dx || si || di || bp
#ifdef __x86_64__
|| r8 || r9 || r10 || r11 || r12 || r13 || r14 || r15
#endif
) {
- printf("[FAIL]\tAll GPRs except SP should be 0\n");
-#define SHOW(x) printf("\t" #x " = 0x%lx\n", x);
+ ksft_test_result_fail("All GPRs except SP should be 0\n");
+#define SHOW(x) ksft_print_msg("\t" #x " = 0x%lx\n", x)
SHOW(ax);
SHOW(bx);
SHOW(cx);
@@ -85,17 +85,15 @@ int main()
SHOW(r14);
SHOW(r15);
#endif
- nerrs++;
} else {
- printf("[OK]\tAll GPRs except SP are 0\n");
+ ksft_test_result_pass("All GPRs except SP are 0\n");
}
if (flags != 0x202) {
- printf("[FAIL]\tFLAGS is 0x%lx, but it should be 0x202\n", flags);
- nerrs++;
+ ksft_test_result_fail("FLAGS is 0x%lx, but it should be 0x202\n", flags);
} else {
- printf("[OK]\tFLAGS is 0x202\n");
+ ksft_test_result_pass("FLAGS is 0x202\n");
}
- return nerrs ? 1 : 0;
+ ksft_finished();
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists