linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: axienet: Fix coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZpkAYdubmlv0jOiZ@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:45:37 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, michal.simek@....com,
	andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	git@....com,
	Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: axienet: Fix coding style issues

Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 02:00:43AM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:24:43 +0530 Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>> Replace all occurences of (1<<x) by BIT(x) to get rid of checkpatch.pl
>> "CHECK" output "Prefer using the BIT macro".
>
>FWIW the BIT() thing is a matter of preference, we don't enforce it
>strictly in networking, it may not be worth patching. Up to you.

In the past, I recall we did.