[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240718134755.378115-7-darwi@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:47:46 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/9] tools/x86/kcpuid: Recognize all leaves with subleaves
cpuid.csv will be extended in further commits with all-publicly-known
CPUID leaves and bitfields. Thus, modify has_subleafs() to identify all
known leaves with subleaves.
Remove the redundant "is_amd" check since all x86 vendors already report
the maxium supported extended leaf at leaf 0x80000000 EAX register.
The extra mentioned leaves are:
- Leaf 0x12, Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) enumeration
- Leaf 0x14, Intel process trace (PT) enumeration
- Leaf 0x17, Intel SoC vendor attributes enumeration
- Leaf 0x1b, Intel PCONFIG (Platform configuration) enumeration
- Leaf 0x1d, Intel AMX (Advanced Matrix Extensions) tile information
- Leaf 0x1f, Intel v2 extended topology enumeration
- Leaf 0x23, Intel ArchPerfmonExt (Architectural PMU ext) enumeration
- Leaf 0x80000020, AMD Platform QoS extended features enumeration
- Leaf 0x80000026, AMD v2 extended topology enumeration
Set the 'max_subleaf' variable for all the newly marked leaves with extra
subleaves. Ideally, this should be fetched from the CSV file instead,
but the current kcpuid code architecture has two runs: one run to
serially invoke the cpuid instructions and save all the output in-memory,
and one run to parse this in-memory output through the CSV specification.
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
---
tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c b/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
index ccbf3b36724f..beb4fde48145 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/kcpuid.c
@@ -98,27 +98,17 @@ static inline void cpuid(u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx)
static inline bool has_subleafs(u32 f)
{
- if (f == 0x7 || f == 0xd)
- return true;
-
- if (is_amd) {
- if (f == 0x8000001d)
+ u32 with_subleaves[] = {
+ 0x4, 0x7, 0xb, 0xd, 0xf, 0x10, 0x12,
+ 0x14, 0x17, 0x18, 0x1b, 0x1d, 0x1f, 0x23,
+ 0x8000001d, 0x80000020, 0x80000026,
+ };
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(with_subleaves); i++)
+ if (f == with_subleaves[i])
return true;
- return false;
- }
- switch (f) {
- case 0x4:
- case 0xb:
- case 0xf:
- case 0x10:
- case 0x14:
- case 0x18:
- case 0x1f:
- return true;
- default:
- return false;
- }
+ return false;
}
static void leaf_print_raw(struct subleaf *leaf)
@@ -255,11 +245,18 @@ struct cpuid_range *setup_cpuid_range(u32 input_eax)
* Some can provide the exact number of subleafs,
* others have to be tried (0xf)
*/
- if (f == 0x7 || f == 0x14 || f == 0x17 || f == 0x18)
+ if (f == 0x7 || f == 0x14 || f == 0x17 || f == 0x18 || f == 0x1d)
max_subleaf = min((eax & 0xff) + 1, max_subleaf);
-
if (f == 0xb)
max_subleaf = 2;
+ if (f == 0x1f)
+ max_subleaf = 6;
+ if (f == 0x23)
+ max_subleaf = 4;
+ if (f == 0x80000020)
+ max_subleaf = 4;
+ if (f == 0x80000026)
+ max_subleaf = 5;
for (subleaf = 1; subleaf < max_subleaf; subleaf++) {
eax = f;
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists