linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240718114521.4b0220b7@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:45:21 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 peterz@...radead.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
 mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, rihams@...com,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack
 traces captured in uprobe

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:29:23 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:

> Ping. What's the status of this patch? Is it just waiting until after
> the merge window, or it got lost?

It's probably best to re-ping after rc1 is out. With recent events, a
lot of us are way behind in our work.

Thanks,

-- Steve