linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86: Move x2APIC ICR helper above kvm_apic_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240719234346.3020464-3-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:43:39 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86: Move x2APIC ICR helper above kvm_apic_write_nodecode()

Hoist kvm_x2apic_icr_write() above kvm_apic_write_nodecode() so that a
local helper to _read_ the x2APIC ICR can be added and used in the
nodecode path without needing a forward declaration.

No functional change intended.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index 35c4567567a2..d14ef485b0bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -2455,6 +2455,29 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lapic_set_eoi);
 
+#define X2APIC_ICR_RESERVED_BITS (GENMASK_ULL(31, 20) | GENMASK_ULL(17, 16) | BIT(13))
+
+int kvm_x2apic_icr_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u64 data)
+{
+	if (data & X2APIC_ICR_RESERVED_BITS)
+		return 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * The BUSY bit is reserved on both Intel and AMD in x2APIC mode, but
+	 * only AMD requires it to be zero, Intel essentially just ignores the
+	 * bit.  And if IPI virtualization (Intel) or x2AVIC (AMD) is enabled,
+	 * the CPU performs the reserved bits checks, i.e. the underlying CPU
+	 * behavior will "win".  Arbitrarily clear the BUSY bit, as there is no
+	 * sane way to provide consistent behavior with respect to hardware.
+	 */
+	data &= ~APIC_ICR_BUSY;
+
+	kvm_apic_send_ipi(apic, (u32)data, (u32)(data >> 32));
+	kvm_lapic_set_reg64(apic, APIC_ICR, data);
+	trace_kvm_apic_write(APIC_ICR, data);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* emulate APIC access in a trap manner */
 void kvm_apic_write_nodecode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 offset)
 {
@@ -3186,29 +3209,6 @@ int kvm_lapic_set_vapic_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t vapic_addr)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define X2APIC_ICR_RESERVED_BITS (GENMASK_ULL(31, 20) | GENMASK_ULL(17, 16) | BIT(13))
-
-int kvm_x2apic_icr_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u64 data)
-{
-	if (data & X2APIC_ICR_RESERVED_BITS)
-		return 1;
-
-	/*
-	 * The BUSY bit is reserved on both Intel and AMD in x2APIC mode, but
-	 * only AMD requires it to be zero, Intel essentially just ignores the
-	 * bit.  And if IPI virtualization (Intel) or x2AVIC (AMD) is enabled,
-	 * the CPU performs the reserved bits checks, i.e. the underlying CPU
-	 * behavior will "win".  Arbitrarily clear the BUSY bit, as there is no
-	 * sane way to provide consistent behavior with respect to hardware.
-	 */
-	data &= ~APIC_ICR_BUSY;
-
-	kvm_apic_send_ipi(apic, (u32)data, (u32)(data >> 32));
-	kvm_lapic_set_reg64(apic, APIC_ICR, data);
-	trace_kvm_apic_write(APIC_ICR, data);
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int kvm_lapic_msr_read(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u64 *data)
 {
 	u32 low;
-- 
2.45.2.1089.g2a221341d9-goog