[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZptiivWvB97Nhyw2@archie.me>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 14:08:58 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Shi-Wu, Lo(Gmail) <shiwulo@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: A new spinlock for multicore (>16) platform
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 02:10:59AM +0800, Shi-Wu, Lo(Gmail) wrote:
> Dear Linux Contributors,
> Yesterday, I did not inform you that I added the mailing list of the
> Operating Systems Laboratory at National Chung Cheng University,
> Taiwan, to this discussion. I apologize for this discourtesy. The
> mailing list has since been removed.
>
> Could you please give me more advice? For example, should we implement
> RON in the kernel under the current circumstances? Or should we
> conduct more research before implementing RON in the kernel?
> Additionally, is the current approach (where the superuser sets the
> routing table) feasible?
Show us the actual code (send the actual patch series). For information
on how to submit patches, see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
in the kernel sources.
Bye!
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists