[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93844c97-46b7-48bd-9397-2bbba9c09510@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 17:39:23 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Jyri Sarha <jyri.sarha@....fi>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: DRI Development List <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon
<nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...com>, Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>, Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>,
Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>, Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add OLDI
properties for AM625 DSS
On 16/07/2024 10:42, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> The DSS in AM625 SoC has 2 OLDI TXes. Refer the OLDI schema to add the
> support for the OLDI TXes.
>
> The AM625 DSS VP1 (port@0) can connect and control 2 OLDI TXes, to use
> them in dual-link or cloned single-link OLDI modes. Add support for an
> additional endpoint under the port@0 to accurately depict the data flow
> path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>
> ---
> .../bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 135 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
> index 399d68986326..249597455d34 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
> @@ -91,6 +91,24 @@ properties:
> For AM625 DSS, the internal DPI output port node from video
> port 1.
> For AM62A7 DSS, the port is tied off inside the SoC.
> + properties:
> + endpoint@0:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/endpoint
> + description:
> + For AM625 DSS, VP Connection to OLDI0.
> + For AM65X DSS, OLDI output from the SoC.
> +
> + endpoint@1:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/endpoint
> + description:
> + For AM625 DSS, VP Connection to OLDI1.
Eh, that's confusing. Why do you have graph to your children? Isn't this
entirely pointless?
> +
> + anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - endpoint
> + - required:
> + - endpoint@0
> + - endpoint@1
>
> port@1:
> $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> @@ -112,6 +130,23 @@ properties:
> Input memory (from main memory to dispc) bandwidth limit in
> bytes per second
>
> + oldi-txes:
> + type: object
> + additionalProperties: true
Why? This looks wrong.
> + properties:
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 0
> +
> + patternProperties:
> + '^oldi_tx@[0-1]$':
Please follow DTS coding style for naming.
> + type: object
> + $ref: ti,am625-oldi.yaml#
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + description: OLDI transmitters connected to the DSS VPs
> +
> allOf:
> - if:
> properties:
> @@ -123,6 +158,19 @@ allOf:
> ports:
> properties:
> port@0: false
> + oldi_txes: false
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: ti,am65x-dss
> + then:
> + properties:
> + oldi_txes: false
> + port@0:
> + properties:
> + endpoint@1: false
>
> required:
> - compatible
> @@ -171,3 +219,90 @@ examples:
> };
> };
> };
> +
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/soc/ti,sci_pm_domain.h>
> +
> + bus {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + dss1: dss@...00000 {
> + compatible = "ti,am625-dss";
> + reg = <0x00 0x30200000 0x00 0x1000>, /* common */
> + <0x00 0x30202000 0x00 0x1000>, /* vidl1 */
> + <0x00 0x30206000 0x00 0x1000>, /* vid */
> + <0x00 0x30207000 0x00 0x1000>, /* ovr1 */
> + <0x00 0x30208000 0x00 0x1000>, /* ovr2 */
> + <0x00 0x3020a000 0x00 0x1000>, /* vp1 */
> + <0x00 0x3020b000 0x00 0x1000>, /* vp2 */
> + <0x00 0x30201000 0x00 0x1000>; /* common1 */
> + reg-names = "common", "vidl1", "vid",
> + "ovr1", "ovr2", "vp1", "vp2", "common1";
> + power-domains = <&k3_pds 186 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> + clocks = <&k3_clks 186 6>,
> + <&vp1_clock>,
> + <&k3_clks 186 2>;
> + clock-names = "fck", "vp1", "vp2";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + oldi-txes {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + oldi0: oldi@0 {
You are duplicating the example from previous schema. No need. Keep
only, one complete example.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists