[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <196a9f11-ba97-4c9c-9815-0ddd0cb50808@grimberg.me>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 14:03:43 +0300
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Ping Gan <jacky_gam_2001@....com>, hare@...e.de, hch@....de,
kch@...dia.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ping.gan@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nvmet: use unbound_wq for RDMA and TCP by default
On 19/07/2024 12:19, Ping Gan wrote:
> When running nvmf on SMP platform, current nvme target's RDMA and
> TCP use bounded workqueue to handle IO, but when there is other high
> workload on the system(eg: kubernetes), the competition between the
> bounded kworker and other workload is very radical. To decrease the
> resource race of OS among them, this patchset will switch to unbounded
> workqueue for nvmet-rdma and nvmet-tcp; besides that, it can also
> get some performance improvement. And this patchset bases on previous
> discussion from below session.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240719084953.8050-1-jacky_gam_2001@163.com/
Hold your horses.
This cannot be just switched without a thorough testing and actual
justification/proof of
a benefit beyond just a narrow use-case brought initially by Ping Gan.
If the ask is to universally use an unbound workqueue, please provide
detailed
benchmarking convincing us that this makes sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists