lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240722001804.8120-2-diego.daniel.professional@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:18:04 +0000
From: Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Cc: n@...aprado.net,
	andrealmeid@...eup.net,
	vinicius@...elet.com,
	diego.daniel.professional@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] lib/kfifo-test.c: add tests for the kfifo structure

Add KUnit tests for the kfifo data structure.
They test the vast majority of macros defined in the kfifo
header (include/linux/kfifo.h).

These are inspired by the existing tests for the 'list' doubly
linked in lib/list-test.c [1].

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/list-test.c

Signed-off-by: Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@...il.com>
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug |  14 +++
 lib/Makefile      |   1 +
 lib/kfifo-test.c  | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/kfifo-test.c

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 59b6765d86b8..d7a4b996d731 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2646,6 +2646,20 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
+config KFIFO_KUNIT_TEST
+	tristate "KUnit Test for the generic kernel FIFO implementation" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  This builds the generic FIFO implementation KUnit test suite.
+	  It tests that the API and basic functionality of the kfifo type
+	  and associated macros.
+
+	  For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
+	  to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index 3b1769045651..db8dc4cb1b47 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw/
 CFLAGS_bitfield_kunit.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
 obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKSUM_KUNIT) += checksum_kunit.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KFIFO_KUNIT_TEST) += kfifo-test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_HASHTABLE_KUNIT_TEST) += hashtable_test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o
diff --git a/lib/kfifo-test.c b/lib/kfifo-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5ea41d22b6b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kfifo-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for the generic kernel FIFO implementation.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Diego Vieira <diego.daniel.professional@...il.com>
+ */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include <linux/kfifo.h>
+
+#define KFIFO_SIZE 32
+#define N_ELEMENTS 5
+
+static void kfifo_test_reset_should_clear_the_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 1);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 2);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+	kfifo_reset(&my_fifo);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_define_should_define_an_empty_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_len_should_ret_n_of_stored_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 buffer1[N_ELEMENTS];
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < N_ELEMENTS; i++)
+		buffer1[i] = i + 1;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+
+	kfifo_in(&my_fifo, buffer1, N_ELEMENTS);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), N_ELEMENTS);
+
+	kfifo_in(&my_fifo, buffer1, N_ELEMENTS);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), N_ELEMENTS * 2);
+
+	kfifo_reset(&my_fifo);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 0);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_put_should_insert_and_get_should_pop(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 out_data = 0;
+	int processed_elements;
+	u8 elements[] = { 3, 5, 11 };
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	// If the fifo is empty, get returns 0
+	processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 0);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		kfifo_put(&my_fifo, elements[i]);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, elements[i]);
+	}
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_in_should_insert_multiple_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 in_buffer[] = { 11, 25, 65 };
+	u8 out_data;
+	int processed_elements;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	kfifo_in(&my_fifo, in_buffer, 3);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		processed_elements = kfifo_get(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, in_buffer[i]);
+	}
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_out_should_pop_multiple_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 in_buffer[] = { 11, 25, 65 };
+	u8 out_buffer[3];
+	int copied_elements;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		kfifo_put(&my_fifo, in_buffer[i]);
+
+	copied_elements = kfifo_out(&my_fifo, out_buffer, 3);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, copied_elements, 3);
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_buffer[i], in_buffer[i]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_dec_init_should_define_an_empty_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	DECLARE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo);
+
+	// my_fifo is a struct with an inplace buffer
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, __is_kfifo_ptr(&my_fifo));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_define_should_equal_declare_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	// declare a variable my_fifo of type struct kfifo of u8
+	DECLARE_KFIFO(my_fifo1, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+	// initialize the my_fifo variable
+	INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo1);
+
+	// DEFINE_KFIFO declares the variable with the initial value
+	// essentially the same as calling DECLARE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo2, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	// my_fifo1 and my_fifo2 have the same size
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(my_fifo1), sizeof(my_fifo2));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo1),
+			kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo2));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo1),
+			kfifo_is_empty(&my_fifo2));
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_alloc_should_initiliaze_a_ptr_fifo(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+	DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(my_fifo, u8);
+
+	INIT_KFIFO(my_fifo);
+
+	// kfifo_initialized returns false signaling the buffer pointer is NULL
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+
+	// kfifo_alloc allocates the buffer
+	ret = kfifo_alloc(&my_fifo, KFIFO_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ret, 0, "Memory allocation should succeed");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kfifo_initialized(&my_fifo));
+
+	// kfifo_free frees the buffer
+	kfifo_free(&my_fifo);
+}
+
+static void kfifo_test_peek_should_not_remove_elements(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	u8 out_data;
+	int processed_elements;
+
+	DEFINE_KFIFO(my_fifo, u8, KFIFO_SIZE);
+
+	// If the fifo is empty, peek returns 0
+	processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 0);
+
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 3);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 5);
+	kfifo_put(&my_fifo, 11);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+	processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 3);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+
+	// Using peek doesn't remove the element
+	// so the read element and the fifo length
+	// remains the same
+	processed_elements = kfifo_peek(&my_fifo, &out_data);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, processed_elements, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_data, 3);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kfifo_len(&my_fifo), 3);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case kfifo_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_reset_should_clear_the_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_define_should_define_an_empty_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_len_should_ret_n_of_stored_elements),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_put_should_insert_and_get_should_pop),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_in_should_insert_multiple_elements),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_out_should_pop_multiple_elements),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_dec_init_should_define_an_empty_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_define_should_equal_declare_init),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_alloc_should_initiliaze_a_ptr_fifo),
+	KUNIT_CASE(kfifo_test_peek_should_not_remove_elements),
+	{},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kfifo_test_module = {
+	.name = "kfifo",
+	.test_cases = kfifo_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&kfifo_test_module);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ