[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240722-unlovely-snowflake-75e44dfd22fa@wendy>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 12:21:07 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, Paul
Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: run savedefconfig for defconfig
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 01:05:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:29 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> >
> > It's been a while since this was run, and there's a few things that have
> > changed. Firstly, almost all of the Renesas stuff vanishes because the
> > config for the RZ/Five is gated behind NONPORTABLE. Several options
> > (like CONFIG_PM) are removed as they are the default values.
> >
> > To retain DEFVFREQ_THERMAL and BLK_DEV_THROTTLING, add PM_DEVFREQ and
> > BLK_CGROUP respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Perhaps we should add an rzfive_defconfig?
I dunno, do we want (potentially a bunch of) platform specific
defconfigs? I'd sooner delete the ones that we have than add more!
I would suggest to just turn on NONPORTABLE, but that isn't a solution
given that the RZ/Five support requires turning off Zicbom. Ultimately I
think it is Palmer's decision whether we add a defconfig for the
platform - it is a bit of a special case given the aforementioned
incompatibility.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists